Rolls-Royce Motor Cards v. Davis, No. 15-0417 (D.N.J. Mar. 11, 2016).
On an unopposed motion for default judgment, the Court entered a permanant injunction restraining the defendant rapper from using the name "Rolls Royce Rizzy" and using Rolls Royce imagery. Plaintiff brought claims for trademark infringement, unfair competition, false designation of origin, and trademark dilution under the Lanham Act, and was awarded default judgment on those claims. However, Plaintiff was not awarded default judgment on its claim for unfair competition under New Jersey common law.
Showing posts with label Domain Names. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Domain Names. Show all posts
March 17, 2016
December 15, 2015
Default Judgment Entered In Grooveshark Case
Arista Records v. Tkach et al., No. 15-cv-3701 (SDNY Dec. 11, 2015).
The Court granted Plaintiff record companies a default judgment on their claims for copyright infringement, trademark counterfeiting, unfair competition, and cybersquatting claims based on the websites "grooveshark.io" and "grooveshark.pw". The plaintiffs had obtained a preliminary injunction, and the defendants did not respond to either the injunction or the complaint in any manner. The Court entered a judgment permanently enjoining Defendants' use of the "Grooveshark" marks and the infringing domains. Plaintiff UMG was also awarded $4 million for the trademark infringement, $400,000 for the cybersquatting, and statutory damages on the copyright claim of over $13 million. Plaintiffs were also granted their attorney's fees, to be calculated on a later submission.
The Court granted Plaintiff record companies a default judgment on their claims for copyright infringement, trademark counterfeiting, unfair competition, and cybersquatting claims based on the websites "grooveshark.io" and "grooveshark.pw". The plaintiffs had obtained a preliminary injunction, and the defendants did not respond to either the injunction or the complaint in any manner. The Court entered a judgment permanently enjoining Defendants' use of the "Grooveshark" marks and the infringing domains. Plaintiff UMG was also awarded $4 million for the trademark infringement, $400,000 for the cybersquatting, and statutory damages on the copyright claim of over $13 million. Plaintiffs were also granted their attorney's fees, to be calculated on a later submission.
September 3, 2013
".music" Okay For Top-Level Domain
DotMusic Ltd. v. .music LLC, 2013 ILRC 2545 (W.I.P.O. Aug. 21, 2013).
WIPO found that that the operation of a ".music" top-level domain would not result in likelihood of confusion with existing trademark registrations (in Europe) for .MUSIC and DOTMUSIC. Decision here.
WIPO found that that the operation of a ".music" top-level domain would not result in likelihood of confusion with existing trademark registrations (in Europe) for .MUSIC and DOTMUSIC. Decision here.
Labels:
Domain Names,
dot Music,
Infringement,
Top Level Domains,
Trademark,
URL,
WIPO
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)